Nearly nine in 10 office-based physicians have adopted an electronic health record (EHR) system. Many of these facilities are reveling in the benefits of digital transformation. Others are scratching their heads wondering where they went wrong.

Did your healthcare facility recently make the move away from paper-based records? How successful was the implementation? If you’re experiencing significant workflow problems, you may have made some implementation missteps.

Today, we’re outlining common workflow problems in EHR systems, so you can identify specific problem areas and make changes as necessary.

7 Potential Workflow Problems in EHR Systems

1. Different Data Field Options

It’s important to pay close attention to the way data fields are designed within your EHR. If these options change or a physician is unfamiliar with them, they could accidentally enter information in the wrong fields.

This is a workflow mistake that could have significant consequences. 

For instance, the new EHR system may display options that allow a physician to select how frequently a drug should be administered. If these options are displayed in an order that’s different from what they’re used to, they could select the incorrect frequency by mistake. 

Contemplating litigation?

We have multiple software expert witnesses available for provision of reports, depositions, and testimonies.

2. Confusing User Interface

Another issue that could impede your EHR workflow? Take a look at how the user interface is designed. If it’s cluttered, confusing, or inaccurate in any way, it could make work harder for all employees.

This is especially the case if some print is much smaller than others. In a fast-paced healthcare setting, it should be easy for physicians and staff members to quickly find the information they need. 

3. Inaccurate Alerts

Alerts are often used to remind physicians when a patient is due for a particular screening, procedure, or test. They can also notify physicians if a patient has a particular health condition that makes certain medications or treatments unusable.

It’s important to make sure these alerts are correctly synced with the EHR.

For instance, the EHR system might display that a patient is allergic to a certain drug, but unless the alert notifies the physician, they could miss that critical detail.

Even when they’re set up correctly, an excessive number of alerts can be distracting and confusing to providers. You may need to remove certain reminders and notifications that are hindering physicians’ ability to perform tasks.

4. Lack of Usability

For any type of software to be effective, it must be user-friendly. When healthcare facilities find that EHR slows down their progress, it’s often because of a lack of end-user training

Before going live with an EHR system, your project team should ensure all users are up-to-date on all requisite training and are comfortable using the software in their environment.

Underprepared employees will struggle to use the software, limiting the amount of face-to-face time they can have with their patients and reducing the number of patients they can see in a day. Over time, this will damage patient satisfaction rates.

5. Facility-Wide Interoperability

Some facilities are widespread enough that they require more than one EHR. In these cases, it’s critical that each system can communicate and interface with the other. 

Even if there’s only one EHR on site, implementers should verify that the individual components within that system are interoperable with one another.

For example, physicians should be able to access a patient’s records regardless of which part of the facility they’re working from. 

6. Incorrect Defaults and Automations

If not configured correctly, an EHR system might automatically default to a certain setting. If this happens, the physician must perform an extra step and make sure the default is correct. This can be difficult if the information displayed isn’t predictable, expected, or transparent. 

For instance, a physician may want to start administering a certain medication at a set time. If the EHR automatically defaults to begin dosing the next day, this might not be correct. Especially in healthcare, these small discretions could have massively damaging outcomes. 

7. Misaligned Workflow Access

With EHR software, certain user groups have access to some permissions, while others do not. If a physician doesn’t realize this, then important messages can fail to reach the intended recipient. 

For example, a physician might order a diagnostic test and add a special note in a patient’s record that they intend for the lab group to see. However, members of the lab group may not have the right permissions to view that data. In this case, neither party will know of the mistake until it’s too late.

Considering these risks, it’s important to ensure everyone is up to speed on who can access and view which types of information. 

Do You Need to Go Back to the Drawing Board?

A successful EHR implementation can transition your healthcare facility from manual, paper-based processes into a more digitized environment. However, there might be roadblocks along the way. 

To fix workflow problems in EHR software, you may need to go back to the drawing board and invest heavily in end-user training, team communication, and system testing. 

Our team of enterprise software consultants can help you launch a project recovery or re-implementation. Contact us below for a free consultation.

About the author

Avatar photo
William L. Baumann is a senior executive with more than 30 years of experience leading growth, transformation, and market expansion across a broad range of industries, including energy, finance, manufacturing, medical devices, professional services, publishing, and nonprofits. He is recognized for his ability to quickly understand complex business environments, design innovative strategies, and deliver measurable results. William has a proven track record in opening new markets, reengineering organizations, and guiding digital and organizational transformation initiatives. His international experience, including living in China and managing long-term initiatives across Latin America, provides him with a global perspective on leadership, strategy, and growth. Over the course of his career, William has achieved significant business outcomes, including securing multimillion-dollar private equity funding, reengineering sales and service delivery models, and implementing best practices that generated substantial revenue growth. His leadership has driven results such as a 380% increase in consumer loan issuance in a single year and a 174% increase in professional services revenue during strategic transformations. Known for his credibility with boards and senior executives, William excels at aligning stakeholders, communicating value at the highest levels, and mentoring high-performing teams to ensure lasting organizational success. In addition to his professional accomplishments, William is deeply committed to community and nonprofit leadership. He has served on boards spanning hospice care, youth development, and the arts, and has volunteered as an ESL instructor in China and as an instructor and mentor in rehabilitation programs. He is also a published thought leader, contributing articles to industry outlets such as Tech Target and InformationWeek, sharing insights on enterprise technology transformation and lessons learned from complex ERP implementations. William earned a Bachelor of Science in Economics, graduating cum laude from Fairleigh Dickinson University. His career reflects a consistent focus on transformational leadership, measurable impact, and the development of both business and community value. William’s combination of strategic vision, operational expertise, and global experience positions him as a trusted advisor and executive leader capable of delivering sustainable growth and transformational results.

Posts You May Like:

The Danger of Not Knowing: Data Silos as a Strategic Risk

The Danger of Not Knowing: Data Silos as a Strategic Risk

Key Takeaways: Data silos create strategic risk by hiding inefficiencies, delaying decisions, and fragmenting enterprise visibility. ERP success depends on data integration—without unified systems and governance, transformation efforts stall. Master data management is...